Faculty Motivation, Human Resource Development, And Wellbeing: A Scoping Review

Truus Poels

doi:10.29284/0e6gqa93

Authors

Truus Poels Business and Management, Webster University, Leiden, Netherlands and Rectorate LUT, LUT University, Lappeenranta/Lahti, Finland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29284/0e6gqa93

Keywords:

Faculty Motivation, Human Resource Development, Job Satisfaction, SDG 3, Wellbeing.

Abstract

This abstract provides an overview of research on faculty motivation, human resource development, and wellbeing within the academic community. Over the past decades, scholars have sought to understand the factors influencing faculty motivation and productivity. While traditional mechanisms such as promotion and sabbaticals play a role, individual motivation is paramount. Studies reveal differences in satisfaction levels among faculty, influenced by factors like salary, infrastructure, and research opportunities. Understanding faculty motivation is complex, with two main approaches: the work context perspective focusing on human resource development and the health perspective emphasizing wellbeing. Interdisciplinary research is crucial to bridge gaps between these perspectives. A scoping review was conducted to map existing knowledge, identifying topics like intrinsic motivation, job satisfaction, and sources of motivation. However, the sheer volume of literature poses a challenge to in-depth analysis. Nonetheless, this review aims to inform evidence-based interventions to enhance faculty motivation, aligning with the United Nations’ (UN's) Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3: Ensure healthy lives and promote wellbeing for all. This goal emphasizes the importance of health and wellbeing, which are crucial for maintaining a motivated and productive faculty. Ultimately, integrating insights from both perspectives can facilitate the development of tailored interventions to promote faculty motivation and wellbeing in higher education institutions.

References

[1] V.M. Lechuga & D.C. Lechuga. Faculty motivation and scholarly work: Self-determination and self-regulation perspective. The Journal of the Professoriate (ISSN 1556-7699). 2012.

[2] R.M.R.D.S.B. Ingle. Evaluation of HRD practices of NBA accredited colleges in Hyderabad district. International Journal of Research in Commerce and Management. https://ijrcm.org.in/download.php?name=ijrcm-1-IJRCM-1_vol-8_2017_issue-05-art-09.pdf&path=uploaddata/ijrcm-1-IJRCM-1_vol-8_2017_issue-05-art-09.pdf. 2017.

[3] T.H.P. Kowalski & W. Loretto. Well-being and HRM in the changing workplace. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(16), 2229–2255. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1345205. 2017.

[4] C. Bailey, R. Yeoman, A. Madden, M. Thompson & G. Kerridge. A Review of the Empirical Literature on Meaningful Work: Progress and Research Agenda. Human Resource Development Review, 18(1), 83–113. 2019.

[5] Z. Munn, M.D.J. Peters, C. Stern et al. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18, 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x. 2018.

[6] R.B. Briner & D. Denyer. Systematic review and evidence synthesis as a practice and scholarship tool. In D. Rousseau (Ed.), Handbook of Evidence-Based Management (pp. 328–347). Oxford University Press. 2010.

[7] R. Kanfer, G. Chen & R.D. Pritchard. Work Motivation, Present and Future. Routledge, New York. 2012.

[8] S.W. Kozlowski. The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Psychology (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press. 2012.

[9] R. Hendijani, D.P. Bischak, J. Arvai & S. Dugar. Intrinsic motivation, external reward, and their effect on overall motivation and performance. Human Performance, 29(4), 251–274. 2016.

[10] R. Averill & J. Major. What motivates higher education educators to innovate? Exploring competence, autonomy, and relatedness – and connections with wellbeing. Educational Research, 62(2), 146–161. 2020.

[11] R. Sidhu & W. Gage. Enhancing the odds of adopting e-learning or community-focused experiential learning as a teaching practice amongst university faculty. Heliyon, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06704. 2021.

[12] S.M. Tharikh, C.Y. Ying & S.R. Hamzah. Work Environment and Employee Wellbeing (EWB) of Air Traffic Controllers (ATCs) in Malaysia. Global Business & Management Research, 10(3). 2018.

[13] R.M. Renapurkar & S.B. Ingle. Evaluation of HRD practices of NBA accredited colleges in Hyderabad district. International Journal of Research in Commerce & Management, 8(5). 2017.

[14] R.P.K. Andoh, E.A. Owusu, E.C. Annan-Prah & G.N. Boampong. Training value, employee internal states and training transfer: examining the web of relationships. The Learning Organization, 29(6). https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-09-2022-0100. 2022.

[15] J. Richardson & S. McKenna. International experience and academic careers: What do academics have to say? Personnel Review, 32(6), 774–795. 2003.

[16] Z. Sabagh, N.C. Hall & A. Saroyan. Antecedents, correlates and consequences of faculty burnout. Educational Research. 2018.

[17] R.A. Swanson, E. Holton & E.F. Holton. Foundations of Human Resource Development. Berrett-Koehler Publishers. 2001.

[18] S. Hamouche & Z. Chabani. COVID-19 and the new forms of employment relationship: implications and insights for human resource development. Industrial and Commercial Training, 53(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-11-2020-0112. 2021.

[19] C. Hastings, C. Boden, D. Thorne, A. Roundtree, M. May & K. Pomeroy. Looking back, looking forward: How the pandemic influenced faculty values. International Journal of Adult Education and Technology, 14(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJAET.332877. 2023.

[20] C.A. Trower. Success on the tenure track: Five keys to faculty job satisfaction. JHU Press. https://doi.org/10.1353/book.15132. 2012.

[21] United Nations. SG’s report on human resources development agenda item 23-c. https://www.un.org/en/desa/sg’s-report-human-resources-development-agenda-item-23-c. 2013.

[22] T. Egan, M. Akdere & S. Kim. Extending research and practice in our dynamic world of work. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 33(2), 109–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21475. 2022.

[23] C.C. Walker, A. Druckman & C. Cattaneo. Understanding the (non-)Use of Societal Wellbeing Indicators in National Policy Development. Social Indicators Research, 150, 911–953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02358-z. 2020.

[24] Forbes. The future of work: Offering employee well-being benefits can stem the great resignation. https://www.forbes.com/sites/jeannemeister/2021/12/16/the-future-of-work-offering-employee-well-being-benefits-can-stem-the-great-resignation/. 2021.

[25] J. Montero-Marin, L. Taylor, C. Crane, M.T. Greenberg, T.J. Ford, S.-J. Blakemore & W. Kuyken. Teachers “Finding Peace in a Frantic World”. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(8), 1689–1708. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000542. 2021.

[26] J.L. Smith, C.D. Stoop, M. Young, R. Belou & S. Held. Grant writing bootcamp: An intervention to enhance the research capacity of academic women in STEM. BioScience, 67(7), 638–645. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix050. 2017.

[27] M.S. Schwietz. Internationalization of the academic profession: An exploratory study of faculty attitudes, beliefs, and involvement at public universities in Pennsylvania (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh). 2006.

[28] M. Davies. Academic freedom: a lawyer’s perspective. Higher Education, 70, 987–1002. 2015.

[29] H. Li & S.I. Khattak. Towards a parsimonious model of faculty motivation, engagement, and work performance. International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics & Mechanics. 2022.

[30] B. Leask, C. Whitsed, H. de Wit & J. Beelen. Faculty engagement: Moving beyond a discourse of disengagement. In Education Abroad (pp. 184–199). Routledge. 2020.

[31] World Economic Forum. 17 Ways technology could change the world by 2027. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/05/17-ways-technology-could-change-the-world-by-2027/. 2022.

[32] R.H. Stupnisky, A. BrckaLorenz & T.F. Nelson Laird. How does faculty research motivation type relate to success? International Journal of Educational Research, 98, 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j/ijer/2019/08.007. 2019.

[33] J. Edwards, D.L. Van Laar & S. Easton. Work-Related Quality of Life (WRQoL) Scale. 2009.

[34] Z.H. Xu, Q. Wang & J.W. Zhu. Rationality behind passion: why do junior faculty members participate in internationalization at a research university in PR China? Fudan Education Forum, 16(5), 83–90. 2018.

[35] M. Koster & K. McHenry. Areas of work-life that contribute to burnout among higher education health science faculty and perception of institutional support. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 18(1), 2235129. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2023.2235129. 2023.

[36] P.J.O. Aloka. Barriers to work wellness among academic staff in higher education institutions. In Leadership Wellness and Mental Health Concerns in Higher Education. IGI Global. 2022.

[37] D. Hammoudi Halat, A. Soltani, R. Dalli, L. Alsarraj & A. Malki. Understanding and fostering mental health and well-being among university faculty: A narrative review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(13), 4425. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12134425. 2023.