Toward Integrated Environmental Management: A Framework Based On Policy, Governance, And Stakeholder Dynamics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29284/gkqxev15Keywords:
integrated environmental management; environmental policy integration; governance capacity; stakeholder participation; institutional support; environmental performance; structural equation modelingAbstract
Integrated environmental management (IEM) has been widely advocated as a response to complex, cross-sectoral environmental challenges; however, empirical evidence remains limited regarding how policy integration translates into measurable environmental outcomes under varying institutional conditions. This study develops and empirically tests an IEM framework linking environmental policy integration (EPI), governance capacity (GC), stakeholder participation (SP), and institutional support (IS) to environmental performance (EP). Using a quantitative cross-sectional survey of environmental management professionals in public institutions (N = 367), the study applies a two-step SEM procedure. Measurement quality is assessed via confirmatory factor analysis, and hypotheses are tested through structural equation modeling with bootstrapped mediation and interaction-based moderation. The CFA results demonstrate satisfactory internal consistency and construct validity (Cronbach’s α = .86–.91; CR = .88–.92; AVE = .64–.70), and discriminant validity is supported using the Fornell–Larcker criterion. Structural results indicate that EPI positively predicts EP (β = .24, p < .001), and SP has an additional direct positive effect on EP (β = .21, p < .001). GC partially mediates the relationship between EPI and EP, evidenced by a significant indirect effect (β = .15, p < .001) and a remaining significant direct effect (β = .12, p = .016). Moreover, IS strengthens the implementation-to-performance relationship, as shown by a significant interaction effect on EP (β = .10, p = .012). Overall, the findings suggest that IEM effectiveness depends not only on policy coherence but also on governance capacity, stakeholder engagement, and supportive institutional conditions. The study contributes a validated, mechanism-oriented framework and offers practical implications for improving cross-sector coordination, capacity building, and institutional credibility in environmental governance.
References
1. Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139192675
2. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage.
3. Jordan, A., & Lenschow, A. (2010). Environmental policy integration: A state of the art review. Environmental Policy and Governance, 20(3), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.539
4. Ostrom, E. (2010). Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 550–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.004
5. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
6. Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed.). Sage.
7. Young, O. R. (2011). Effectiveness of international environmental regimes: Existing knowledge, cutting-edge themes, and research strategies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(50), 19853–19860. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1111690108
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
