Spatial Dimensions Of Ambush Marketing In Sports: Implications For Urban Planning And Regional Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29284/fm2s2w72Keywords:
Ambush marketing, urban geography, city branding, spatial governance, sustainable urban developmentAbstract
In the contemporary world of international sports, marketing strategies have evolved into complex, multidimensional systems that extend beyond mere promotion. The phenomenon of ambush marketing where non-sponsors exploit major sports events to gain publicity without official authorization raises significant ethical, economic, and legal concerns. This study investigates ambush marketing through the interdisciplinary lens of geography, urban planning, and development, emphasizing how such practices are spatially manifested within host cities. Mega sporting events such as the Olympics and FIFA World Cup act as catalysts for urban transformation, where spatial control, city branding, and economic redevelopment converge. Ambush marketing capitalizes on these restructured cityscapes, using public spaces, transport routes, and digital infrastructures to circumvent regulatory boundaries and achieve unauthorized visibility. By integrating spatial theory and event geography, this paper explores how ambush marketing alters urban form, challenges spatial governance, and impacts local economies. It argues that the phenomenon functions as both a commercial strategy and a spatial process that reshapes city visibility and development trajectories. The findings highlight the need for policy frameworks that align urban design, marketing regulation, and sustainable development to safeguard equity in urban commercial spaces. Ultimately, ambush marketing is repositioned as a spatially embedded socio-economic issue one that reflects the intersection of global capital, city planning, and the geography of visibility in contemporary urban landscapes.
References
1. Burton, N., & Chadwick, S. (2018). Ambush Marketing Is Dead, Long Live Ambush Marketing: A Redefinition and Typology of an Increasingly Prevalent Phenomenon. Journal of Advertising Research, 58(3), 282–296. https://doi. org/10.2501/JAR-2017-014
2. Chadwick, S., & Burton, N. (2011). The Evolving Sophistication of Ambush Marketing: A Typology of Strategies. Thunderbird International Business Review, 53(6), 709–719.
3. Chanavat, N., & Desbordes, M. (2014). Towards the regulation and restriction of ambush marketing? The first truly social and digital mega sports event: Olympic Games, London 2012. International Journal of Sports Marketing & Sponsorship, 15(3), 151–161.
4. Cornwell, T. B., Weeks, C. S., & Roy, D. P. (2005). Sponsorship-linked marketing: Opening the black box. Journal of Advertising, 34(2), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2005.10639194
5. Crow, D., & Hoek, J. (2003). Ambush marketing: A critical review and some practical advice. Marketing Bulletin, 14(1), 1–14.
6. Dickson, G., Naylor, M., & Phelps, S. (2015). Consumer attitudes towards ambush marketing. Sport Management Review, 18(2), 280–290.
7. Ellis, D. L., Parent, M. M., & Seguin, B. (2016). Olympic Ambush Marketing Networks and Knowledge Transfer: Examining Their Impact on the Institutionalization of Anti-Ambush Marketing Legislation. Journal of Sport Management, 30(5), 473–489.
8. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2015-0205
9. McKelvey, S., Sandler, D., & Snyder, K. (2012). Sport Participant Attitudes Toward Ambush Marketing: An Exploratory Study of ING New York City Marathon Runners. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 21(1), 7–18.
10. Meenaghan, T. (1994). Ambush marketing – immoral or imaginative practice? Journal of Advertising Research, 34(5), 77–88.
11. Meenaghan, T. (1998). Ambush marketing: corporate strategy and consumer reaction. Psychology & Marketing, 15(4), 305–322.
12. Nufer, G. (2013). Ambush Marketing in Sports: Theory and Practice. Routledge.
13. O'Sullivan, P., & Murphy, P. (1998). Ambush Marketing: The Ethical Issues. Psychology & Marketing, 15(4), 349–366.
14. Piątkowska, M., & Gocłowska, S. (2016). Classification Of Ambush Marketing Methods In Sport – Evidence From The 2012 Uefa European Championship. International Journal of Contemporary Management, 15(1), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.4467/24498939IJCM.16.007.4840
15. Piątkowska, M., Żyśko, J., & Gocłowska, S. (2015). A Systematic Literature Review on Ambush Marketing in Sport. Physical Culture and Sport. Studies and Research, 66, 14–27. https://doi. org/10.1515/pcssr-2015-0002
16. Sandler, D. M., & Shani, D. (1989). Olympic Sponsorship vs. ‘Ambush’ Marketing: Who Gets the Gold? Journal of Advertising Research, 29(4), 9–14.
17. Séguin, B., Lyberger, M., O'Reilly, N., & McCarthy, L. (2005). Internationalising ambush marketing — a comparative study. International Journal of Sports Marketing & Sponsorship, 6(4), 216–230.
18. Shani, D., & Sandler, D. M. (1998). Ambush marketing: is confusion to blame for the flickering of the flame? Psychology & Marketing, 15(4), 367–383.
19. Stipp, H., & Schiavone, N. P. (1996). Modeling the impact of Olympic sponsorship on corporate image. Journal of Advertising Research, 36, 22–28.
20. Townley, S., Harrington, D., & Couchman, N. (1998). The Legal and Practical Prevention of Ambush Marketing in Sports. Psychology & Marketing, 15(4), 333–348.
21. Wolfsteiner, E., Grohs, R., & Wagner, U. (2015). What Drives Ambush Marketer Misidentification? Journal of Sport Management, 29(2), 137–154. https://doi.org/10. 1123/JSM. 2014-0122
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
