Energy-Aware Task Offloading in Fog-Cloud-IoT Ecosystem Using Reinforcement Learning

Authors

  • N. Revathi Assistant Professor (SG), Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Nehru Institute of Engineering and Technology, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Dr. D. Suryaprabha Assistant Professor, Department of Information Technology, Nehru Arts and Science College, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Dr. T. Chithrakumar Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation (Deemed to be University), Green Fields, Vaddeswaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.
  • A. Shanmugapriya Assistant Professor, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Sri Eshwar College of Engineering, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Dr. R. Sundar Associate Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology, Avadi, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Reshma Ramachandran Assistant Professor, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, V.S.B. College of Engineering Technical Campus, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29284/ijasis.12.1.2026.145-160

Keywords:

Fog computing; cloud computing; Internet of Things (IoT); reinforcement learning; energy efficiency; Q-learning; task offloading; latency reduction; resource allocation; sustainable computing.

Abstract

With the proliferation of Internet of Things (IoT) applications, the fog–cloud computing paradigm has emerged as a crucial architecture for achieving low latency, energy efficiency, and scalability in distributed systems. However, optimal task offloading across heterogeneous fog and cloud layers remains a significant challenge due to dynamic workloads, limited fog resources, and varying network conditions. This paper proposes an energy-aware task offloading framework using reinforcement learning (RL) to intelligently distribute computation between fog and cloud nodes. The RL agent learns optimal offloading strategies by interacting with the environment, dynamically balancing energy consumption, execution latency, and network load. A Q-learning-based optimization model is employed to determine the most efficient offloading decisions, while the energy model accounts for computation, transmission, and idle power consumption at both fog and cloud layers. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed RL-based approach achieves a 31% reduction in average energy consumption and a 27% improvement in task response time compared to baseline heuristic and static scheduling techniques. The model adapts efficiently under fluctuating workloads and variable network bandwidth, maintaining service quality while minimizing energy footprint. This intelligent task offloading strategy is particularly effective for real-time IoT applications such as smart healthcare, connected vehicles, and industrial automation, ensuring sustainable and resource-efficient operation across the Fog–Cloud–IoT ecosystem.

References

1. Devi, A. Sangeetha, A. Shanmugapriya, and A. Kalaivani. "Feature Selection and Classification using a Positive Learning Approach Focused on Graph and Neural Network." 2022 6th International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology. IEEE, 2022.

2. Shanmugapriya, A., et al. "Vehicle Supervision System Using Navigation Systems and Internet of Things." 2023 International Conference on Sustainable Communication Networks and Application (ICSCNA). IEEE, 2023

3. Khan, A., Ullah, F., Shah, D., Khan, M.H., Ali, S. and Tahir, M., 2025. EcoTaskSched: a hybrid machine learning approach for energy-efficient task scheduling in IoT-based fog-cloud environments. Scientific Reports, 15(1), p.12296.

4. Alli, A.A. and Alam, M.M., 2019. SecOFF-FCIoT: Machine learning based secure offloading in Fog-Cloud of things for smart city applications. Internet of Things, 7, p.100070.

5. Alsadie, D., 2024. A comprehensive review of AI techniques for resource management in fog computing: Trends, challenges and future directions. IEEE Access.

6. Tripathy, S.S., Roy, D.S. and Barik, R.K., 2021. M2FBalancer: A mist-assisted fog computing-based load balancing strategy for smart cities. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments, 13(3), pp.219-233.

7. Negi, V., Joshi, D. and Sharma, A., 2025. Optimizing Task Allocation in Fog-Based IoT for Smart City Solutions. In Citizen-Centric Artificial Intelligence for Smart Cities (pp. 1-20). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.

8. Devi, A. Sangeetha, A. Shanmugapriya, and A. Kalaivani. "Feature Selection and Classification using a Positive Learning Approach Focused on Graph and Neural Network." 2022 6th International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology. IEEE, 2022.

9. K.Kalpana., Dr.B.Paulchamy., "A novel design of nano router with high-speed crossbar scheduler for digital systems in QCA paradigm", Circuit World, Vol. 48 No. 4, pp. 464-478.,2022

10. Shanmugapriya, A., et al. "Vehicle Supervision System Using Navigation Systems and Internet of Things." 2023 International Conference on Sustainable Communication Networks and Application (ICSCNA). IEEE, 2023

11. Aldossary, D., Aldahasi, E., Balharith, T. and Helmy, T., 2025. A Systematic Literature Review on Load-Balancing Techniques in Fog Computing: Architectures, Strategies, and Emerging Trends. Computers, 14(6), p.217.

12. Rafique, W., 2025. ML-RASPF: A Machine Learning-Based Rate-Adaptive Framework for Dynamic Resource Allocation in Smart Healthcare IoT. Algorithms, 18(6), p.325.

13. Jin, W. and Rezaeipanah, A., 2025. Dynamic task allocation in fog computing using enhanced fuzzy logic approaches. Scientific Reports, 15(1), p.18513.

14. Sharma, A. and Thangaraj, V., 2025. A Lightweight Trajectory Aware Application Placement in IoT-Fog-Cloud Environment. Journal of Grid Computing, 23(1), pp.1-25.

15. Ihsan, R. and Zeebaree, S.R., 2025. Parallel Processing in Distributed and Hybrid Cloud-Fog Architectures: A Systematic Review of Scalability and Efficiency Strategies. The Indonesian Journal of Computer Science, 14(1).

16. Amzil, A., Hanini, M. and Zaaloul, A., 2025. Modeling and analysis of LoRa-enabled task offloading in edge computing for enhanced battery life in wearable devices. Cluster Computing, 28(3), p.201.

17. Alsamarai, N.A. and Uçan, O.N., 2024. Improved Performance and Cost Algorithm for Scheduling IoT Tasks in Fog–Cloud Environment Using Gray Wolf Optimization Algorithm. Applied Sciences, 14(4), p.1670.

18. Pournazari, J., Ullah, A., Al-Dubai, A. and Liu, X., 2025. Computation offloading in the edge-to-cloud compute continuum: a survey of federated architectural solutions. Cluster Computing, 28(13), p.839.

19. Ahmed, S.F., Shawon, S.S., Afrin, S., Rafa, S.J., Hoque, M. and Gandomi, A.H., 2025. Optimising Internet of Things (IoT) Performance Through Cloud, Fog and Edge Computing Architecture. IET Wireless Sensor Systems, 15(1), p.e70016.

20. Al-Qadhi, A.K., Latip, R., Chiong, R., Athauda, R. and Hussin, M., 2025. Independent task scheduling algorithms in fog environments from users’ and service providers’ perspectives: a systematic review. Cluster Computing, 28(3), p.209.

21. Low, C.K., Ng, Y.P., Tew, Y. and Qing, L.C., The study of fog computing: security and privacy, energy consumption, quality of experience/services, offloading, and task scheduling. Recent Trends Cloud Comput Web Engi, 7(1).

22. Xu, Z., Zhang, Y., Li, H., Yang, W. and Qi, Q., 2020. Dynamic resource provisioning for cyber-physical systems in cloud-fog-edge computing. Journal of Cloud Computing, 9(1), p.32.

23. Rana, B., Singh, Y. and Singh, P.K., 2021. A systematic survey on internet of things: Energy efficiency and interoperability perspective. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 32(8), p.e4166.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

[1]
N. Revathi, D. D. Suryaprabha, D. T. Chithrakumar, A. Shanmugapriya, D. R. Sundar, and R. Ramachandran, “Energy-Aware Task Offloading in Fog-Cloud-IoT Ecosystem Using Reinforcement Learning”, IJASIS, pp. 145–160, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.29284/ijasis.12.1.2026.145-160.

Share