AI-Enabled Autonomous Cyber-Physical Systems Using Intelligent Sensors, Edge Computing, and Secure Wireless Communication

Authors

  • Raju Kumar Department of Computer Science & Engineering Purnea College of Engineering, Purnea (Under DSTTE Patna), Bihar Engineering University Patna, Bihar, 854303, India
  • Praveen Kumar Department of Electronics & Communication Engineering Purnea College of Engineering, Purnea (Under DSTTE Patna), Bihar Engineering University Patna, Bihar, 854303, India
  • Deepak Kumar Department of Computer Science & Engineering Government Engineering College, Munger (Under DSTTE Patna), Bihar Engineering University Patna, Bihar, 811202, India
  • Kamal Raj Praveen Department of Computer Science & Engineering Supaul College of Engineering, Supaul (Under DSTTE Patna), Bihar Engineering University Patna, Bihar, 852131, India
  • Gopal Krishna Department of Computer Science & Engineering Supaul College of Engineering, Supaul (Under DSTTE Patna), Bihar Engineering University Patna, Bihar, 852131, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29284/xnqcnf41

Keywords:

Cyber-Physical Systems; Edge Computing; Intelligent Sensors; Secure Wireless Communication; Artificial Intelligence; Autonomous Systems; Anomaly Detection.

Abstract

Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) integrate computational intelligence with physical processes to enable autonomous decision-making in domains such as manufacturing, transportation, healthcare, and smart grids. However, conventional CPS architectures that rely on centralized cloud processing suffer from high latency, bandwidth constraints, and vulnerability to cyber-attacks, which limit their applicability in time-critical and safety-critical operations. This paper proposes an AI-enabled autonomous CPS framework that unifies intelligent multi-modal sensors, edge-based artificial intelligence (AI) inference, and secure wireless communication into a coherent five-layer architecture. The proposed system embeds lightweight convolutional neural network (CNN) and long short-term memory (LSTM) models at the edge to perform real-time anomaly detection and local actuation, while a secure communication layer employs Advanced Encryption Standard (AES-256) with blockchain-assisted key exchange to preserve data confidentiality and integrity across the network. A prototype implementation was evaluated against conventional non-AI and cloud-only AI baselines using latency, detection accuracy, energy consumption, packet delivery ratio, encryption overhead, and mean-time-to-recovery as performance indicators. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed architecture reduces end-to-end latency by approximately 82% relative to the conventional baseline, improves anomaly detection accuracy to 97.3%, and lowers energy consumption per inference by 57%, while maintaining a packet delivery ratio above 99%. These findings confirm that combining intelligent sensing, edge computing, and secure wireless protocols yields a scalable, resilient, and low-latency foundation for next-generation autonomous cyber-physical systems.

References

1. Ahmed, S., Zafar, S., & Khan, M. A. (2021). Secure communication protocols for cyber-physical systems: A review. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 178, 102983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102983

2. Alladi, T., Chamola, V., Parizi, R. M., & Choo, K.-K. R. (2020). Blockchain applications for industry 4.0 and industrial IoT: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 79764–79800. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988579

3. Baheti, R., & Gill, H. (2011). Cyber-physical systems. In T. Samad & A. M. Annaswamy (Eds.), The impact of control technology (pp. 161–166). IEEE Control Systems Society.

4. Chen, J., & Ran, X. (2019). Deep learning with edge computing: A review. Proceedings of the IEEE, 107(8), 1655–1674. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2019.2921977

5. Humayed, A., Lin, J., Li, F., & Luo, B. (2017). Cyber-physical systems security: A survey. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 4(6), 1802–1831. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2017.2703172

6. Lee, E. A. (2008). Cyber physical systems: Design challenges. Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Symposium on Object and Component-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC), 363–369. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISORC.2008.25

7. Li, Y., Wang, X., & Zhao, Q. (2021). LSTM-based predictive maintenance for industrial equipment using multivariate sensor data. Sensors, 21(5), 1734. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21051734

8. Patel, R., Mehta, S., & Joshi, D. (2023). Ultra-reliable low-latency 5G communication for cyber-physical systems: Performance evaluation and challenges. IEEE Communications Magazine, 61(4), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.001.2200456

9. Rajkumar, R., Lee, I., Sha, L., & Stankovic, J. (2010). Cyber-physical systems: The next computing revolution. Proceedings of the 47th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC), 731–736. https://doi.org/10.1145/1837274.1837461

10. Shi, W., Cao, J., Zhang, Q., Li, Y., & Xu, L. (2016). Edge computing: Vision and challenges. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 3(5), 637–646. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2016.2579198

11. Wang, L., & Sun, H. (2022). Federated learning at the network edge for privacy-preserving cyber-physical system analytics. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 18(9), 6321–6331. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2022.3145678

12. Yang, Z., Chen, Y., & Huang, W. (2020). Multi-sensor fusion for autonomous vehicle perception: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 21(11), 4471–4486. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2019.2943188

13. Zhou, Z., Chen, X., Li, E., Zeng, L., Luo, K., & Zhang, J. (2019). Edge intelligence: Paving the last mile of artificial intelligence with edge computing. Proceedings of the IEEE, 107(8), 1738–1762. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2019.2918951

Downloads

Published

2025-09-25

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

[1]
R. Kumar, P. Kumar, D. Kumar, K. R. Praveen, and G. Krishna, “AI-Enabled Autonomous Cyber-Physical Systems Using Intelligent Sensors, Edge Computing, and Secure Wireless Communication”, IJASIS, pp. 863–874, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.29284/xnqcnf41.

Share