Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Intelligent Signal Detection and Interference Mitigation in Cognitive Radio Networks

Authors

  • Priyanka Kumari Assistant Professor, Department of Electronics & Communication Engineering Government Engineering College, Aurangabad, Bihar – 824125.
  • Dr. Sheelu Kumari Assistant Professor, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering Government Engineering College, Aurangabad, Bihar.
  • Pinki Kumari Assistant Professor, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering Government Engineering College, Aurangabad, Bihar.
  • Alok Kumar Assistant Professor, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering Government Engineering College, Aurangabad, Bihar.
  • Alok Kumar Assistant Professor, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering Government Engineering College, Aurangabad, Bihar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29284/jq765g28

Keywords:

Explainable Artificial Intelligence; Cognitive Radio Networks; Spectrum Sensing; Interference Mitigation; SHAP; Deep Learning; Signal Detection.

Abstract

Cognitive Radio Networks (CRNs) enable dynamic and opportunistic utilization of the radio spectrum by allowing secondary users to sense and access underutilized frequency bands without causing harmful interference to licensed primary users. Deep learning models have substantially improved the accuracy of spectrum sensing and signal classification tasks in CRNs; however, their black-box nature limits transparency, trust, and regulatory acceptance in safety-critical wireless deployments. This paper proposes an Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)-enabled framework that integrates a hybrid Convolutional Neural Network–Long Short-Term Memory (CNN-LSTM) architecture with post-hoc interpretability techniques, namely SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME), and Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM), for intelligent signal detection and interference mitigation. The proposed system further incorporates a reinforcement-learning-based dynamic spectrum access controller that reallocates channels based on interpreted decisions, thereby closing the loop between detection, explanation, and mitigation. Simulation results on a synthetic RadioML-inspired dataset demonstrate that the proposed XAI-CNN-LSTM model achieves 96.7% detection accuracy, outperforming energy detection, support vector machine, random forest, and conventional black-box CNN baselines, while SHAP-based feature attribution reveals signal-to-noise ratio and spectral energy as the most influential features governing classification decisions. The results confirm that embedding explainability into cognitive radio signal processing pipelines improves both diagnostic transparency and interference mitigation efficiency without compromising detection performance.

References

1. Arrieta, A. B., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., Barbado, A., García, S., Gil-López, S., Molina, D., Benjamins, R., Chatila, R., & Herrera, F. (2020). Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Information Fusion, 58, 82–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012

2. Gunning, D. (2017). Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Program Report.

3. Haykin, S. (2005). Cognitive radio: Brain-empowered wireless communications. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 23(2), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2004.839380

4. Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S.-I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 4765–4774.

5. Mitola, J., & Maguire, G. Q. (1999). Cognitive radio: Making software radios more personal. IEEE Personal Communications, 6(4), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1109/98.788210

6. Naparstek, O., & Cohen, K. (2019). Deep multi-user reinforcement learning for distributed dynamic spectrum access. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 18(1), 310–323. https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2018.2879433

7. Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016). "Why should I trust you?": Explaining the predictions of any classifier. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1135–1144. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939778

8. Selvaraju, R. R., Cogswell, M., Das, A., Vedantam, R., Parikh, D., & Batra, D. (2017). Grad-CAM: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 618–626. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2017.74

9. Yucek, T., & Arslan, H. (2009). A survey of spectrum sensing algorithms for cognitive radio applications. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 11(1), 116–130. https://doi.org/10.1109/SURV.2009.090109

10. Zhang, Z., Xiao, Y., Ma, Z., Xiao, M., Ding, Z., Lei, X., Karagiannidis, G. K., & Fan, P. (2019). 6G wireless networks: Vision, requirements, architecture, and key technologies. IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, 14(3), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1109/MVT.2019.2921208

Downloads

Published

2025-09-25

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

[1]
P. Kumari, D. S. Kumari, P. Kumari, A. Kumar, and A. Kumar, “Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Intelligent Signal Detection and Interference Mitigation in Cognitive Radio Networks”, IJASIS, pp. 847–854, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.29284/jq765g28.

Share