A Novel Ensemble Learning Framework for Nonlinear Modeling of UV Exposure and Skin Damage

Authors

  • Resmi R Professor LBS Institute of Technology for Women ,Thiruvananthapuram Dept.of Electronics and Communication Engineering https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0849-5509 (Corresponding author)
  • Sajan Jerome Associate Professor LBS Institute of Technology for Women, Thiruvananthapuram Department: Dept.of Mechanical Engineering ORCID id : https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4231-5265
  • Anu Babu Assistant Professor St Thomas Institute for Science and Technology, Trivandrum Dept.of Electronics and Communication Engineering ORCID id : https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4304-5391
  • Anilkumar E N Professor LBS Institute of Technology for Women Dept.of Mechanical Engineering ORCID id : https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5185-9489
  • Pramod P Professor College name: LBS College of Engineering Kasaragod Dept.of Electronics and Communication Engineering In ORCID id :https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1240-6548
  • Baiju P S Assistant Professor LBS College of Engineering, Kasaragod Dept.of Electronics and Communication Engineering ORCID id: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8332-6765

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29284/d4pqe975

Keywords:

Ultraviolet Index, Skin Damage Index, Personalized UV Risk, Environmental Sensing, Ensemble Learning, Predictive Modeling, Dermatological Risk Assessment, Mobile Health.

Abstract

The Ultraviolet Index (UVI) is widely used to communicate the intensity of solar ultraviolet radiation, yet it remains a coarse public warning rather than a truly personalized risk indicator. The same ambient UVI can lead to very different biological outcomes once exposure duration, atmospheric conditions, and individual skin sensitivity are taken into account. This revised manuscript presents a structured framework for personalized UV risk prediction that combines multisource environmental sensing with nonlinear modeling and ensemble learning. At the core of the framework is a Skin Damage Index (SDI) that grows nonlinearly with UVI and exposure time, reflecting the fact that harm does not increase in a simple one-to-one manner at higher radiation levels. A fused prediction layer then integrates Random Forest, gradient boosting, and neural networks so that noisy tabular inputs, interaction-heavy patterns, and subtle nonlinear dependencies can be handled together rather than in isolation. The paper also introduces a modular architecture for data ingestion, preprocessing, inference, and user-facing recommendation delivery, making the framework suitable for implementation in mobile health platforms, wearable systems, and preventive dermatology applications. To improve interpretability, the manuscript includes system diagrams and analytical visualizations that show how risk evolves across different UV intensities and exposure durations. Overall, the work reframes UV safety from a single-number advisory problem into a personalized, context-aware prediction problem that is better aligned with real-world skin exposure.

References

[1] E. J. Topol, “High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence,” Nature Medicine, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 44–56, 2019.

[2] A. Rajkomar, J. Dean, and I. Kohane, “Machine learning in medicine,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 380, no. 14, pp. 1347–1358, 2019.

[3] R. Miotto, F. Wang, S. Wang, X. Jiang, and J. T. Dudley, “Deep learning for healthcare: review, opportunities and challenges,” Briefings in Bioinformatics, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1236–1246, 2018.

[4] H. Banaee, M. U. Ahmed, and A. Loutfi, “Data mining for wearable sensors in healthcare,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1749–1759, 2013.

[5] R. Esteva, A. Robicquet, B. Ramsundar, et al., “A guide to deep learning in healthcare,” Nature Medicine, vol. 25, pp. 24–29, 2019.

[6] G. Yang, Q. Ye, and J. Xia, “Artificial intelligence in biomedical signal and image processing: advances and challenges,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 82–97, 2022.

[7] S. Azizi, A. Khosravi, and S. Nahavandi, “AI-driven healthcare: emerging technologies and challenges,” IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, vol. 15, pp. 123–142, 2022.

[8] D. Ting, L. Pasquale, L. Peng, et al., “Artificial intelligence and deep learning in ophthalmology,” Nature Medicine, vol. 25, pp. 965–973, 2019.

[9] A. Esteva et al., “Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks,” Nature, vol. 542, pp. 115–118, 2017.

[10] S. Saria, A. Butte, and A. Sheikh, “Better medicine through machine learning: what’s real, and what’s artificial?” PLoS Medicine, vol. 15, no. 12, 2018.

[11] L. A. Celi et al., “The MIMIC-III critical care database,” Scientific Data, vol. 3, 2016.

[12] M. M. Warrier, L. Abraham, and R. Resmi, “An Optimal Deep Ensemble Model for the Classification of Pneumonia from Chest X-Rays,” in Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Computing Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT), 2023, pp. 1–7.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-25

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

[1]
R. R, S. Jerome, A. Babu, A. E N, P. P, and B. P S, “A Novel Ensemble Learning Framework for Nonlinear Modeling of UV Exposure and Skin Damage”, IJASIS, pp. 477–486, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.29284/d4pqe975.

Share