Artificial Intelligence Models For Strengthening Educational Decision-Making And Risk Prevention

Authors

  • Dr. Arpeeta Anand Independent Researcher, South Delhi, Delhi
  • Dr. Suvarna Chaure Assistant Professor, Computer Engineering, SIES Graduate School of Technology, Nerul, Navi Mumbai, Thane, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra
  • Dr Puneet Kapatia Independent Researcher, East Delhi, Delhi
  • Dr Deepak A Vidhate Professor & HOD, Department of Information Technology, Dr Vithalrao Vikhe Patil College of Engineering, Ahilyanagar, Maharashtra
  • Akansh Garg Director array Research Pvt Ltd
  • Dr.Nidhi Jindal Assistant Professor, Department of English, COER University, Haridwar, Roorkee, Uttarakhand.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29284/rh8thj96

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Educational Decision-Making, Risk Prevention, Predictive Analytics, Machine Learning, Smart Education Systems.

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative force in the education sector, enabling data-driven decision-making and proactive risk management in academic institutions. Traditional educational systems often rely on fragmented data sources and manual evaluation processes, leading to inefficiencies in identifying student performance trends, dropout risks, and institutional challenges. AI models, including machine learning, predictive analytics, and natural language processing, provide integrated and intelligent frameworks that enhance decision-making accuracy and enable early risk detection. This study examines the role of AI models in strengthening educational decision-making and mitigating risks such as student attrition, academic failure, and resource misallocation. The research adopts an analytical framework based on data integration, predictive modeling, real-time analytics, and decision support systems. The findings indicate that AI-driven systems significantly improve institutional transparency, optimize resource allocation, and enable early intervention strategies through predictive insights. Moreover, AI models facilitate personalized learning pathways and adaptive decision-making processes, contributing to improved student outcomes and institutional performance. Despite challenges such as data privacy concerns, model bias, and implementation costs, the long-term benefits of AI adoption outweigh the limitations. The paper concludes that AI-based decision systems are essential tools for modern educational institutions aiming to enhance efficiency, reduce risks, and achieve sustainable academic success.

References

[1] C. Romero and S. Ventura, “Educational data mining: A review of the state of the art,” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. C, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 601–618, 2010.

[2] R. S. J. d. Baker and P. S. Inventado, “Educational data mining and learning analytics,” in Learning Analytics, New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2014, pp. 61–75.

[3] G. Siemens and R. S. J. d. Baker, “Learning analytics and educational data mining: Towards communication and collaboration,” in Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Learning Analytics, 2012, pp. 252–254.

[4] E. Alpaydin, Introduction to Machine Learning, 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 2014.

[5] V. Tinto, Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition, 2nd ed. Chicago, IL, USA: Univ. Chicago Press, 1993.

[6] S. B. Kotsiantis, C. J. Pierrakeas, and P. E. Pintelas, “Predicting students’ performance in distance learning,” Comput. Educ., vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 1037–1045, 2010.

[7] G. W. Dekker, M. Pechenizkiy, and J. M. Vleeshouwers, “Predicting students dropout: A case study,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Educational Data Mining, 2009, pp. 41–50.

[8] S. Buckingham Shum and R. Ferguson, “Social learning analytics,” Educ. Technol. Soc., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 3–26, 2012.

[9] A. J. Bowers, R. Sprott, and M. Taff, “Do we know who will drop out?,” Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 407–439, 2013.

[10] E. Turban, J. E. Aronson, and T. P. Liang, Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems, 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall, 2005.

[11] B. P. Woolf, Building Intelligent Interactive Tutors, Burlington, MA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann, 2009.

[12] R. Luckin et al., Intelligence Unleashed: An Argument for AI in Education, London, U.K.: Pearson, 2016.

[13] N. Selwyn, “Should robots replace teachers?,” Polity Press, 2019.

[14] W. Holmes, M. Bialik, and C. Fadel, Artificial Intelligence in Education, Boston, MA, USA: Center for Curriculum Redesign, 2019.

[15] D. Ifenthaler and J. Y. K. Yau, “Utilising learning analytics for study success,” Educ. Technol. Soc., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 134–148, 2020.

[16] J. W. Creswell, Research Design, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage, 2014.

[17] R. K. Yin, Case Study Research and Applications, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage, 2014.

[18] K. C. Laudon and J. P. Laudon, Management Information Systems, 14th ed. Pearson, 2016.

[19] M. Saunders, P. Lewis, and A. Thornhill, Research Methods for Business Students, 7th ed. Pearson, 2016.

[20] C. Romero and S. Ventura, “Data mining in education,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 12–27, 2013.

[21] A. Al-Marridi et al., “Data-driven decision-making in education,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 123–135, 2020.

[22] T. Mitchell, Machine Learning, New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 1997.

[23] G. Siemens, “Learning analytics: The emergence of a discipline,” Amer. Behavioral Scientist, vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 1380–1400, 2013.

[24] J. Manyika et al., “Big data: The next frontier,” McKinsey Global Institute, 2011.

[25] D. Silver et al., “Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks,” Nature, vol. 529, pp. 484–489, 2016.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-09

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

[1]
D. A. Anand, D. S. Chaure, D. P. Kapatia, D. D. A. Vidhate, A. Garg, and D. Jindal, “Artificial Intelligence Models For Strengthening Educational Decision-Making And Risk Prevention”, IJASIS, pp. 1978–1989, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.29284/rh8thj96.

Share