A Work Motivation Mediation Model On Relationship Between Compensation, Competence, Transformational Leadership, And Lecturer Performance

Authors

  • Wahyuddin Makassar State University, Sulawesi Selatan, Indonesia.
  • Arismunandar Makassar State University, Sulawesi Selatan, Indonesia.
  • Ansar Makassar State University, Sulawesi Selatan, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29284/5k2s2j60

Keywords:

Work motivation; Compensation; Competence; Transformational leadership; Lecturer performance; Structural Equation Modeling (SEM).

Abstract

This study aims to examine the role of work motivation as a mediator in the effects of compensation, competence, and transformational leadership on lecturer performance. A quantitative approach grounded in positivism was employed, using an ex post facto research design. Data were collected through Likert-scale questionnaires (1–5) administered to 289 lecturers at Muhammadiyah University of Makassar, who were randomly selected from a population of 754 lecturers using the Slovin formula. The research instruments were validated through expert judgment and pilot testing and demonstrated high reliability (Cronbach’s α ranging from 0.842 to 0.937). Data analysis was conducted using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with AMOS, and the proposed model met the overall goodness-of-fit criteria. The results indicate that compensation has a significant positive effect on work motivation but does not have a significant direct effect on lecturer performance; however, compensation exerts a significant indirect effect on performance through work motivation. Competence significantly influences both work motivation and lecturer performance, and demonstrates a significant indirect effect via work motivation. Transformational leadership has a significant effect on work motivation, shows no significant direct effect on performance, yet has a significant indirect effect through work motivation. These findings confirm that work motivation functions as a central mechanism or primary mediator that converts various organizational inputs into performance outcomes. This study emphasizes that lecturer performance is more appropriately understood as an outcome formed through prior psychological processes. Consequently, compensation and transformational leadership are more effective when strategically directed toward strengthening work motivation, while competence development emerges as the most fundamental strategy, as it operates simultaneously through both ability-based and motivational pathways.

References

1. Amutuhaire, T. (2022). The Reality of the ‘Publish or Perish’ Concept, Perspectives from the Global South. Publishing Research Quarterly, 38(2), 281–294. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12109-022-09879-0

2. Asfahani, A. M. (2022). The impact of role conflict on turnover intention among faculty members: A moderated mediation model of emotional exhaustion and workplace relational conflict. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1087947. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1087947

3. Borzu, Z. A., Karimy, M., Leitão, M., Pimenta, F., Albergaria, R., Khoshnazar, Z., & Koukamari, P. H. (2025). Validation of the menopause representation questionnaire (MenoSentations-Q) among Iranian women and cross-cultural comparison with Portuguese women. BMC Women’s Health, 25(1), 87. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-025-03606-5

4. Canal, M. N., De Las Mercedes De Obesso, M., & Rivera, C. A. P. (2024). Does educators’ digital competence improve entrepreneurial students’ learning outcomes? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 20(3), 1707–1730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-023-00921-x

5. Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M., & Nassrelgrgawi, A. S. (2016). Performance, incentives, and needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness: A meta-analysis. Motivation and Emotion, 40(6), 781–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-016-9578-2

6. Chen, Y., Zhang, Z., Zhou, J., Liu, C., Zhang, X., & Yu, T. (2023). A cognitive evaluation and equity-based perspective of pay for performance on job performance: A meta-analysis and path model. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1039375. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1039375

7. Chiu, T. K., Falloon, G., Song, Y., Wong, V. W., Zhao, L., & Ismailov, M. (2024). A self-determination theory approach to teacher digital competence development. Computers & Education, 214, 105017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105017

8. Dang, T. D., Phan, T. T., Vu, T. N. Q., La, T. D., & Pham, V. K. (2024). Digital competence of lecturers and its impact on student learning value in higher education. Heliyon, 10(17). https://www.cell.com/heliyon/fulltext/S2405-8440(24)13349-X

9. Dasanayaka, C. H., Abeykoon, C., Ranaweera, R., & Koswatte, I. (2021). The impact of the performance appraisal process on job satisfaction of the academic staff in higher educational institutions. Education Sciences, 11(10), 623. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100623

10. de Obesso, M. de las M., Núñez-Canal, M., & Pérez-Rivero, C. A. (2023). How do students perceive educators’ digital competence in higher education? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 188, 122284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122284

11. Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-Determination Theory in Work Organizations: The State of a Science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4(1), 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108

12. Dervenis, C., Fitsilis, P., & Iatrellis, O. (2022). A review of research on teacher competencies in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 30(2), 199–220. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-08-2021-0126 https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-08-2021-0126

13. Fareed, M. Z., Su, Q., & Aslam, M. U. (2023). Transformational Leadership and Project Success: The Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment. Sage Open, 13(1), 21582440231154796. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231154796

14. Figueiredo, E., Margaça, C., García, J. C. S., & Ribeiro, C. (2025). The Contribution of Reward Systems in the Work Context: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Directions for Future Research. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 16(5), 16525–16559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02492-w

15. Fulmer, I. S., Gerhart, B., & Kim, J. H. (2023). Compensation and performance: A review and recommendations for the future. Personnel Psychology, 76(2), 687–718. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12583

16. Hassan, R. S., Amin, H. M., & Ghoneim, H. (2024). Decent work and innovative work behavior of academic staff in higher education institutions: The mediating role of work engagement and job self-efficacy. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03177-0

17. Jørgensen, F., & Hanssen, T.-E. S. (2018). Research incentives and research output. Higher Education, 76(6), 1029–1049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0238-1

18. Kenny, J., & Fluck, A. E. (2022). Emerging principles for the allocation of academic work in universities. Higher Education, 83(6), 1371–1388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00747-y

19. Kholifah, N., Nurtanto, M., Mutohhari, F., Abi Hamid, M., Mutiara, I., Setiawan, D., & Saputro, I. N. (2025). Factors influencing student career choice in vocational education in Indonesia: A mediating effect of self-efficacy. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101369

20. Kim, D. H., & Bak, H.-J. (2020). Reconciliation Between Monetary Incentives and Motivation Crowding-Out: The Influence of Perceptions of Incentives on Research Performance. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(6), 1292–1317. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1771387

21. Lazarides, R., Schiefele, U., Daumiller, M., & Dresel, M. (2025). From Teacher Motivation to Teaching Behaviour: A Systematic Review of the Mediating Processes. Educational Research Review, 100703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100703

22. López-Martín, E., Gutiérrez-de-Rozas, B., González-Benito, A. M., & Expósito-Casas, E. (2023). Why do teachers matter? A meta-analytic review of how teacher characteristics and competencies affect students’ academic achievement. International Journal of Educational Research, 120, 102199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2023.102199

23. Maksimovic, J., & Evtimov, J. (2023). Positivism and post-positivism as the basis of quantitative research in pedagogy. Research in Pedagogy, 13(1), 208–218. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1132657

24. Manzoor, F., Wei, L., & Asif, M. (2021). Intrinsic rewards and employee’s performance with the mediating mechanism of employee’s motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 563070. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.563070

25. McAnally, K., & Hagger, M. S. (2024). Self-determination theory and workplace outcomes: A conceptual review and future research directions. Behavioral Sciences, 14(6), 428. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14060428

26. Moreira, M. A., Arcas, B. R., Sánchez, T. G., García, R. B., & Melero, M. J. R. (2023). Teachers’ pedagogical competences in higher education: A systematic literature review. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 20(1), 90–123. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.01.07

27. Mushabe, C., Abreh, M. K., & Mills, C. A. (2022). Reconceptualizing faculty workload as a measure of human resource motivation and performance in higher education. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 6(1), 100279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100279

28. Nelly, N., Prabowo, H., Bandur, A., & Elidjen, E. (2024). The mediating role of competency in the effect of transformational leadership on lecturer performance. International Journal of Educational Management, 38(2), 333–354. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-06-2023-0275

29. Ng, T. W. (2017). Transformational leadership and performance outcomes: Analyses of multiple mediation pathways. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(3), 385–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.11.008

30. Pacheco, P. O., & Coello-Montecel, D. (2023). Does psychological empowerment mediate the relationship between digital competencies and job performance? Computers in Human Behavior, 140, 107575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107575

31. Reymert, I., & Thune, T. (2023). Task complementarity in academic work: A study of the relationship between research, education and third mission tasks among university professors. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 48(1), 331–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09916-8.

32. Sinniah, S., Al Mamun, A., Md Salleh, M. F., Makhbul, Z. K. M., & Hayat, N. (2022). Modeling the significance of motivation on job satisfaction and performance among the academicians: The use of hybrid structural equation modeling-artificial neural network analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 935822. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.935822

33. Thibault Landry, A., & Whillans, A. (2018). The Power of Workplace Rewards: Using Self-Determination Theory to Understand Why Reward Satisfaction Matters for Workers Around the World. Compensation & Benefits Review, 50(3), 123–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886368719840515.

34. Van Den Broeck, A., Ferris, D. L., Chang, C.-H., & Rosen, C. C. (2016). A Review of Self-Determination Theory’s Basic Psychological Needs at Work. Journal of Management, 42(5), 1195–1229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316632058

35. Xue, H., Luo, Y., Luan, Y., & Wang, N. (2022). A meta-analysis of leadership and intrinsic motivation: Examining relative importance and moderators. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 941161. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.941161

36. Yuliantari Dewi, N. K., & Ardana, I. K. (2022). Peran motivasi kerja dalam memediasi pengaruh kompensasi terhadap kinerja kayawan [PhD Thesis]. Udayana University.

37. Zhang, J., Zhang, L. J., & Zhu, Y. (2023). Development and validation of a genre-based second language (L2) writing self-efficacy scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1181196. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1181196

38. Zhang, S., Hanim A. Hamid, A., & Salwana Alias, B. (2025). Transformational leadership and scientific research performance of university faculty: A self-determination theory perspective. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2548950. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2548950

39. Zhao, N., Fan, D., & Chen, Y. (2021). Understanding the Impact of Transformational Leadership on Project Success: A Meta‐Analysis Perspective. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2021(1), 7517791. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7517791

40. Zhou, Q., Huang, R., & Mao, J.-Y. (2025). A serial mediation effect of digital transformation on employee performance: An ability-motivation-opportunity framework and employee unlearning. Journal of Business Research, 201, 115696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115696

Downloads

Published

2026-03-09

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Wahyuddin, Arismunandar, and Ansar, “A Work Motivation Mediation Model On Relationship Between Compensation, Competence, Transformational Leadership, And Lecturer Performance”, IJASIS, pp. 1370–1382, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.29284/5k2s2j60.

Share