FUSION OF HARRIS HAWK’S AND PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION TO IMPROVE PERFORMANCE IN WIRELESS NETWORK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29284/ijasis.9.1.2023.20-28Keywords:
Harris Hawk’s algorithm, wireless network, particle swarm optimization algorithm, coverage and connectivity, quality-of-service.Abstract
Wireless networks will develop as multi-hop transmission exploits among mobile nodes to communicate data packets. The unique features of wireless networks make it difficult for mobile nodes to communicate reliably. Most physical routing systems do not consider stable connections during packet transmission to manage high mobility and environmental impediments, which results in increased network latency and packet loss. This paper describes a Fusion of Harris Hawk's and Particle Swarm (HHPS) Optimization algorithms to improve performance in wireless networks. This mechanism uses Harris' hawk optimization (HHO) to select the better Group head (GH) by applying energy, link quality, and connectivity parameters. Then, the CH forms the groups based on the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm. To simulate tests of HHPS performance, Network Simulator NS-3 is used. Comparing HHPS to the baseline technique, the routing performs better. Simulation findings demonstrate that the proposed HHPS mechanism increases connectivity and coverage based on iteration.
References
M. Chen, U. Challita, W. Saad, C. Yin, and M. Debbah, “Artificial neural networks-based machine learning for wireless networks: A tutorial,” IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 3039-3071, 2019.
A. Unnikrishnan, and V. Das, "Cooperative Routing For Improving The Lifetime of Wireless Ad-Hoc Networks," International Journal of Advances in Signal and Image Sciences, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 17-24, 2022.
R.V. Kulkarni, and G.K. Venayagamoorthy, “Particle swarm optimization in wireless sensor networks: A brief survey,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 262-267, 2010.
P.S. Rao, P.K. Jana, and H. Banka, “A particle swarm optimization based energy efficient cluster head selection algorithm for wireless sensor networks,” Wireless networks, vol. 23, pp. 2005-2020.
B.K. Tripathy, P.K. Reddy Maddikunta, Q.V. Pham, T.R. Gadekallu, K. Dev, S. Pandya, and B.M. ElHalawany, “Harris hawk optimization: a survey on variants and applications,” Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, vol. 2022, 2022.
K. Dev, P.K.R. Maddikunta, T.R. Gadekallu, S. Bhattacharya, P. Hegde, and S. Singh, “Energy optimization for green communication in IoT using Harris Hawk optimization,” IEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 685-694, 2022.
H.Q. Abdulrab, F.A. Hussin, A. Abd Aziz, A. Awang, I. Ismail, M.S.M. Saat, and H. Shutari, “Optimal coverage and connectivity in industrial wireless mesh networks based on Harris’ hawk optimization algorithm,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 51048-51061. 2022.
D. Javaheri, S. Gorgin, J.A. Lee, and M. Masdari, “An improved discrete Harris hawk optimization algorithm for efficient workflow scheduling in multi-fog computing,” Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems, vol. 36, pp. 100787,
A. Alzaqebah, O. Al-Kadi, and I. Aljarah, “An enhanced Harris hawk optimizer based on an extreme learning machine for feature selection,” Progress in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 77-97, 2023.
M. Haris, and S. Zubair, “Mantaray modified multi-objective Harris hawk optimization algorithm expedites optimal load balancing in cloud computing,” Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 9696-9709, 2022.
M. Mansoor, A.F. Mirza, and Q. Ling, “Harris hawk optimization-based MPPT control for PV systems under partial shading conditions,’ Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 274, no. 122857, 2020.
M.K. Prakash, and A.V. Ramani, “Harris Hawk Optimizer based Enriched Deep Neural Network for early stage prediction for Diabetes Mellitu, International Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 7, no. 5, 2022.
S. Ramalingam, K. Baskaran, “An efficient data prediction model using hybrid Harris Hawk Optimization with random forest algorithm in wireless sensor network,” Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 5171-5195, 2022.
H. Gezici, and H. Livatyalı, “Chaotic Harris hawks optimization algorithm,” Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 216-245, 2022.
V. Nivedhitha, P. Thirumurugan, A. Gopi Swaminathan, and V. Eswaramoorthy, “Combination of improved Harris’s hawk optimization with fuzzy to improve clustering in wireless sensor network,’ Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 5969-5984, 2021.
C. Li, J. Li, H. Chen, M. Jin, and H. Ren, “Enhanced Harris Hawks optimization with multi-strategy for global optimization tasks,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 185, no. 115499. 2021.
X. Xue, R. Shanmugam, S. Palanisamy, O.I. Khalaf, D .Selvaraj, and G.M. Abdulsahib, “A hybrid cross-layer with harris-hawk-optimization-based efficient routing for wireless sensor networks,” Symmetry, vol. 15, no. 2, 438. 2023.
S.G. Rameshkumar, "Improving Quality of Service through enhanced node selection technique in Wireless Sensor Networks," International Journal of MC Square Scientific Research, vol. 8, no. 1,pp. 141-150, 2016.
H. Azath, A. K. Velmurugan, K. Padmanaban, A. M. S. Kumar, and M. Subbiah , “Ant based routing algorithm for balanced the load and optimized the AMNET lifetime,” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 2523, pp. 1-9, 2023.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Herbert Raj P , Ravi Kumar P
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
