Public–Private Pathways To Grow Emerging Farmer Entrepreneurship Within The North West Province, South Africa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29284/c3a9qp28Keywords:
Agricultural Development, Capability Building, Emerging Farmer Entrepreneurship, Market Access.Abstract
Background - Entrepreneurship is central to agricultural productivity and rural livelihoods, yet South Africa’s emerging farmers continue to face binding constraints—market access, skills, finance, and extension capacity—that limit commercialisation and scale.
Purpose - This paper proposes and tests a practical success framework to strengthen emerging farmer entrepreneurship and commercial readiness.
Method - Using an explanatory mixed-methods design, we first surveyed 410 emerging farmers and 500 commercial farmers to quantify gaps in markets, equipment, support services, and managerial/technical skills. Follow-up interviews with four senior informants (government, co-ops, black commercial farmers) were used to explain and contextualise the quantitative results.
Findings - Commercial farmers benefit from stronger links with market agencies, better-equipped operations, and more frequent engagement with agricultural co-operatives and private technical support. Emerging farmers report deficits in financial resources, technical knowledge, and managerial skills, and remain concentrated in informal markets. Qualitative evidence highlights selection weaknesses and limited after-care in support programmes, alongside latent willingness from private actors to co-invest in training, market linkage, and mentoring.
Contribution - Synthesising our evidence with recent literature, we propose a capability-driven framework anchored in four levers: (1) targeted capability building (financial, technical, and market skills), (2) structured market access pathways (including NFPMs, buyers, and processors), (3) blended finance with performance-based milestones, and (4) accountable public–private delivery partnerships. Recent studies on entrepreneurship drivers, extension capacity, smallholder market access, and conditional-grant performance corroborate the framework’s focus and feasibility.
Managerial implications - Provincial departments and agricultural co-operatives can operationalise the framework through jointly governed pipelines that (a) select committed candidates, (b) provide sequenced capability sprints, (c) guarantee defined market routes, and (d) release finance against verified milestones.
References
[1] World Bank, World Development Report 2016: Digital Dividends. Washington, DC, 2016.
[2] Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), The State of Food and Agriculture 2023: Investing in Resilient Agrifood Systems. Rome, 2023.
[3] National Agricultural Marketing Council (NAMC), South African Agricultural Sector Review 2021. Pretoria, 2021.
[4] Statistics South Africa, Producer Price Index for Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing: January 2021. Pretoria, 2021.
[5] Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2020. Rome, 2020.
[6] J.D.B. Gil, P. Reidsma, K.E. Giller, L. Todman, A. Whitmore, and M.K. van Ittersum, “Towards a framework for crop modelling under climate change and food security,” Global Food Security, vol. 23, pp. 128–137, 2019.
[7] J. Sachs, The Age of Sustainable Development. New York: Columbia University Press, 2018.
[8] Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), The Future of Food and Agriculture: Drivers and Trends. Rome, 2024.
[9] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Agricultural Outlook 2024–2033. Paris, 2024.
[10] C.S.L. Dias, R.G. Rodrigues, and J.J. Ferreira, “Agricultural entrepreneurship: Going beyond farmer entrepreneurship,” Journal of Rural Studies, vol. 70, pp. 225–234, 2019a.
[11] A. Bignotti, C.M. Rogerson, and B. Urban, “Enabling environments for agricultural entrepreneurship in South Africa,” International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 189–208, 2021.
[12] J.A. Van Niekerk, “Sustainability of new-generation commercial farmers in South Africa,” South African Journal of Agricultural Extension, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 55–67, 2024.
[13] L.D. Ndlovu, N.A. Kruger, and N. Meyer, “Unleashing the potential: Exploring internal factors for the success of women entrepreneurs in South Africa’s agricultural sector,” Journal of Contemporary Management, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 158–182, 2023.
[14] S.J. Mnikathi, B.W. Muriithi, and M.A. Antwi, “Participation of emerging commercial farmers in private-sector investment interventions,” Agriculture, vol. 15, no. 5, p. 450, 2025.
[15] S. Zantsi, J.C. Greyling, and N. Vink, “Towards a common understanding of emerging farmers in South Africa,” Agrekon, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 154–166, 2019.
[16] Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation (DPME), Impact Evaluation of the Comprehensive Agricultural Support Programme (CASP). Pretoria, 2021.
[17] Parliamentary Budget Office, 2023/24 Performance on Agriculture Conditional Grants. Cape Town, 2025.
[18] A.S. Pelser and A. Meintjes, “Success framework to improve emerging farmer entrepreneurship,” Journal of Contemporary Management, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 287–314, 2023.
[19] C. Waife and Z. Yona, Building Business Management Competence among Emerging Farmers in Rural South Africa. Pretoria: Agricultural Research Council, 2016.
[20] National Agricultural Marketing Council (NAMC), Smallholder Market Access Estimates Q3 (Oct–Dec 2024). Pretoria, 2025.
[21] L.M. Maesela, “Farm entrepreneurship among emerging farmers under the land restitution program in Limpopo Province,” Cogent Social Sciences, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 2306920, 2024.
[22] J. Van Zyl, Agriculture and Rural Development in South Africa: The Macroeconomic Context. Pretoria: NAMC, 2019.
[23] L. Christiaensen and W. Martin, “Agriculture, structural transformation, and poverty reduction: Eight new insights,” World Development, vol. 109, pp. 413–426, 2018.
[24] African Development Bank (AfDB), Southern Africa Agricultural Entrepreneurship Outlook Report. Abidjan, 2024.
[25] Government Technical Advisory Centre (GTAC), Agriculture Support Programme Spending Review Update. Pretoria, 2023.
[26] Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation (DPME), Evaluation of the Comprehensive Agricultural Support Programme (CASP): Implementation and Impact Report. Pretoria, 2023.
[27] C.S.L. Dias, R.G. Rodrigues, and J.J. Ferreira, “Exploring agricultural entrepreneurship: The role of innovation and resource-based view,” Land Use Policy, vol. 85, pp. 420–432, 2019b.
[28] E. Lahiff, Land Reform in South Africa: A Status Report 2008. Cape Town: PLAAS, 2008.
[29] Ministry of Lands and Resettlement, Revised National Resettlement Policy 2018–2027. Windhoek: Government of Namibia, 2018.
[30] S. Moyo, R. Hall, and M. Aliber, “Land Reform and Agrarian Change in Southern Africa: Towards Inclusive Growth,” Journal of Agrarian Change, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 112–134, 2024.
[31] S. Moyo, Contested Terrain: Land Reform and Civil Society in Contemporary Zimbabwe. Pietermaritzburg: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press, 2009.
[32] W. Odendaal, Affirmative Action Loan Scheme: Policy and Impact Review. Windhoek: Legal Assistance Centre, 2005.
[33] M. Van Burick, “Land reform without ownership remains a huge challenge,” Landbouweekblad, Sept. 14, 2016.
[34] S. Fitz-Koch, M. Nordqvist, S. Carter, and E. Hunter, “Entrepreneurship in the agricultural sector: A literature review and future research agenda,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 259–285, 2018.
[35] J. McAllister, Policy Gaps and Awareness Levels among Emerging Farmers in South Africa. Cape Town: PLAAS, 2018.
[36] B. Tibesigwa and M. Visser, “Assessing gender gaps in agricultural productivity and support access in South Africa,” South African Journal of Science, vol. 112, no. 3–4, pp. 1–8, 2016.
[37] D.D. Arinloye, A.R. Linnemann, G. Hagelaar, O. Omta, and J.M. Bloemhof, “Integration of smallholder farmers into agribusiness supply chains in sub-Saharan Africa: Opportunities and challenges,” Outlook on Agriculture, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 41–49, 2015.
[38] V. Bitzer and J. Bijman, “From innovation to coordination: Value chain governance and upgrading in emerging agriculture,” International Journal on Food System Dynamics, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 178–192, 2015.
[39] World Bank, Digital Agriculture and Climate-Smart Farming in Africa. Washington, DC, 2023.
[40] G. Hodge and C. Greve, “Public–Private Partnerships: An International Performance Review,” Public Administration Review, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 545–558, 2007.
[41] M. C.O.H. Roopa and M.S. Rani, “Questionnaire designing for a survey,” The Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 273–277, 2012.
[42] J. Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
[43] R. Coe, It’s the Effect Size, Stupid: What Effect Size is and Why it is Important. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the British Educational Research Association, University of Exeter, 2002.
[44] B. Cousins, R. Hall, and D. Mayson, “Reassessing land-reform outcomes in post-apartheid South Africa,” Development Southern Africa, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 771–789, 2023.
[45] V. Gumede, “Land Reform and Populism: Lessons from Zimbabwe,” Africa Growth Agenda, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 24–28, 2018.
[46] R. Heale and A. Twycross, “What is a case study?,” Evidence-Based Nursing, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 7–8,2018.
[47] A. Kinsley, Zimbabwe’s Land Reform: Lessons for South Africa. Harare: SAPES Books, 1999.
[48] D. Grimsey and M. Lewis, Public–Private Partnerships: The Worldwide Revolution in Infrastructure Provision and Project Finance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2004.
[49] W.R. Scott, Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2014.
[50] T. Bowyer-Bower and C. Stoneman, Land Reform in Zimbabwe: Constraints and Prospects. London: Routledge, 2017
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
