Operational Friction in Multimodal Logistics Networks and Supply Chain Resilience: Implications for Onshoring and Offshoring Decisions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29284/h7wbxd85Keywords:
Supply chain resilience; Logistics service networks; Multimodal logistics networks; Transit time uncertainty; Robust optimization; Adaptive large neighborhood search (ALNS); Operational Friction Index (OFI)Abstract
Disruption-driven transit-time uncertainty and volatile logistics costs are intensifying interest in shoring decisions and the resilience of multimodal logistics networks. This study introduces an Operational Friction Index (OFI) to quantify execution frictions on transport service-arcs (e.g., congestion, transfer complexity, and documentation delays) and examines how these frictions shape robust routing and shoring outcomes. We formulate a robust single-commodity multimodal freight routing problem under budgeted transit-time uncertainty and incorporate OFI into the objective via a penalty term, yielding a single augmented evaluation criterion. To solve large-scale instances, we develop an adaptive large neighborhood search (ALNS) algorithm with OFI-aware scoring in selected destroy/repair operators and a record-to-record acceptance rule based on the augmented objective. Computational experiments benchmark ALNS against CPLEX and a Max–Min Ant System baseline across instance sizes, reporting optimality gaps and runtimes. The results show that ALNS achieves near-optimal solutions on tractable instances and scales effectively when exact optimization becomes time-consuming, while OFI helps explain performance differences across operational settings and industry profiles. The proposed framework supports the evaluation of shoring configurations and multimodal network designs under transit-time uncertainty
References
[1]. Archetti, C., Peirano, L., Speranza, M.G., 2022. Optimization in multimodal freight
transportation problems: a survey. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 299 (1), 1–20.
[2]. Bai, X., Ma, Z., Zhou, Y., 2023. Data-driven static and dynamic resilience assessment of the
global liner shipping network. Transp. Res. Part E Logis. Transp. Rev. 170, 103016.
[3]. Barbieri, P., Boffelli, A., Elia, S., Fratocchi, L., Kalchschmidt, M., Samson, D., 2020. What can we
learn about reshoring after covid-19? Oper. Manage. Res. 13, 131–136.
[4]. Bertsimas, D., Brown, D.B., Caramanis, C., 2011. Theory and applications of robust
optimization. SIAM Rev. 53 (3), 464–501.
[5]. Bertsimas, D., Sim, M., 2003. Robust discrete optimization and network flows. Math. Program.
98 (1), 49–71.
[6]. Council of Economic Advisers. Issue brief: supply chain resilience.
https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/cea/written-materials/2023/11/30/issue-brief-supplychain-
resilience. Accessed: 2025-03-08.
[7]. Chen, X., Hu, X., Liu, H., 2024. Low-carbon route optimization model for multimodal freight
transport considering value and time attributes. Socioecon. Plann. Sci. 96, 102108.
[8]. Cheng, M. P.S., Tang, C., Lo, C. K.Y., Yeung, A. C.L., Lam, H. K.S., 2024. Return to the united
states: impact of reshoring announcements and reshoring risks on market valuation. Manage. Sci.
[9]. Choi, T.Y., Narayanan, S., Novak, D., Olhager, J., Sheu, J.-B., Wiengarten, F., 2021. Managing
extended supply chains. J. Bus. Logist. 42 (2), 200–206.
[10]. Cooray, P., Rupasinghe, T.D., 2017. Machine learning-based parameter tuned genetic
algorithm for energy minimizing vehicle routing problem. J. Indus. Eng. 2017 (1), 3019523.
[11]. Dib, O., Moalic, L., Manier, M.-A., Caminada, A., 2017. An advanced GA–VNS combination
for multicriteria route planning in public transit networks. Expert Syst. Appl. 72, 67–82.
[12]. Dueck, G., 1993. New optimization heuristics: the great deluge algorithm and the recordto-
record travel. J. Comput. Phys. 104 (1), 86–92.
[13]. Fariman, S.K., Danesh, K., Pourtalebiyan, M., Fakhri, Z., Motallebi, A., Fozooni, A., 2024. A
robust optimization model for multi-objective blood supply chain network considering scenario
analysis under uncertainty: a multi-objective approach. Sci. Rep. 14 (1), 9452.
[14]. Gilani, H., Sahebi, H., 2022. A data-driven robust optimization model by cutting
hyperplanes on vaccine access uncertainty in COVID-19 vaccine supply chain. Omega 110,
102637.
[15]. Goodarzi, A.H., Jabbarzadeh, A., Fahimnia, B., Paquet, M., 2024. Evaluating the
sustainability and resilience of an intermodal transport network leveraging consoli-dation
strategies. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 188, 103616.
[16]. Guo, F., Xu, Y., Huang, Z., Wu, Y., 2024. Collaborative optimization of routing and storage
strategy of multi-period multimodal transport in an uncertain environment. Computers Oper.
Res. 167, 106676.
[17]. Hosseini, S., Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., 2019. Review of quantitative methods for supply chain
resilience analysis. Trans. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 125, 285–307.
[18]. Hu, Y., Liu, Q., Li, S., Wu, W., 2025. Robust emergency logistics network design for
pandemic emergencies under demand uncertainty. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 196,
103957.
[19]. Jiang, B., Song, Y., 2024. A robust optimization model for emergency location considering
the uncertainty and correlation of transportation network capacity. Systems 12 (8), 277.
[20]. Jo, J., Kim, S., 2022. Assessing shoring strategies based on efficiency. Expert Syst. Appl.
207, 118032.
Int. J.Adv.Sig.Img.Sci, Vol. 12, No. 2s, 2026
2140
[21]. Kajjumba, G.W., Nagitta, O.P., Osra, F.A., Mkansi, M., 2020. Offshoring-outsourcing and
onshoring tradeoffs: the impact of coronavirus on global supply chain. In: Outsourcing and
Offshoring. IntechOpen.
[22]. Ke, J.-y., Cho, W., Su, H., 2025. Flying through uncertainty: air transportation’s impact on
supply chain resilience and inventory efficiency. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 197,
104042.
[23]. Kuhn, H., Schubert, D., Holzapfel, A., 2021. Integrated order batching and vehicle routing
operations in grocery retail-a general adaptive large neighborhood search algorithm. Eur. J. Oper.
Res. 294 (3), 1003–1021.
[24]. Kumar, S., Tang, C.S., 2022. Expanding the boundaries of the discipline: the 30thanniversary
issue of production and operations management. Prod. Oper. Manage. 31 (12), 4257–
4261.
[25]. Liu, Z., Yu, B., Zhang, L., Sun, Y., 2025. Resilience enhancement of multi-modal public
transportation system via electric bus network redesign. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev.
193, 103810.
[26]. Maharjan, R., Kato, H., 2022. Resilient supply chain network design: a systematic literature
review. Transp. Rev. 42 (6), 739–761.
[27]. Mara, S. T.W., Norcahyo, R., Jodiawan, P., Lusiantoro, L., Rifai, A.P., 2022. A survey of
adaptive large neighborhood search algorithms and applications. Computers Oper. Res. 146,
105903.
[28]. Min, H., Ahn, Y.-H., Ma, J.-H., 2024. Measuring dynamic supply chain risks for the offshoring
decision in the post-COVID-19 era: a longitudinal study. Transp. J. 63 (3), 188–206.
https://doi.org/10.1002/tjo3.12026
[29]. Mohammadi, M., Dehghan, M., Pirayesh, A., Dolgui, A., 2022. Bi-objective optimization of a
stochastic resilient vaccine distribution network in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Omega
113, 102725.
[30]. National Association of Manufacturers, . Manufacturers’ outlook survey: Fourth quarter
2023. https://nam.org/2023-fourth-quarter-manufacturers-outlook-survey/. Accessed: 2024-
05-01.
[31]. Nanphang, A., Luangpaiboon, P., 2025. Data envelopment analysis on response surface
method for efficient parameterization of evolutionary algorithms in industrial applications. In:
International Conference on Machine Learning and Soft Computing. Springer, pp. 32–43.
[32]. Pang, Y., Pan, S., Ballot, E., 2024. Resilience analysis of multi-modal logistics service
network through robust optimization with budget-of-uncertainty. IFAC-PapersOnLine 58 (19),
676–681. 18th IFAC Symposium on Information Control Problems in Manufacturing INCOM 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2024.09.222
[33]. Pascariu, B., Sama, M., Pellegrini, P., D’Ariano, A., Rodriguez, J., Pacciarelli, D., 2022.
Effective train routing selection for real-time traffic management: improved model and ACO
parallel computing. Computers Oper. Res. 145, 105859.
[34]. Pedroletti, D., Ciabuschi, F., 2023. Reshoring: a review and research agenda. J. Bus. Res.
164, 114005.
[35]. Poo, M. C.-P., Wang, T., Yang, Z., 2024. Global food supply chain resilience assessment: a
case in the United Kingdom. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 181, 104018.
[36]. Qi, Y., Harrod, S., Psaraftis, H.N., Lang, M., 2022. Transport service selection and routing
with carbon emissions and inventory costs consideration in the context of the belt and road
initiative. Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 159, 102630.
[37]. Ropke, S., Pisinger, D., 2006. An adaptive large neighborhood search heuristic for the
pickup and delivery problem with time windows. Transp. Sci. 40 (4), 455–472.
[38]. Transportation Research Part E 204 (2025) 104416
[39]. Sawik, T., 2023. Reshore or not reshore: a stochastic programming approach to supply
chain optimization. Omega 118, 102863.
[40]. Sawik, T., Sawik, B., 2024. Risk-averse decision-making to maintain supply chain viability
under propagated disruptions. Int. J. Prod. Res. 62 (8), 2853–2867.
[41]. Song, L., Yu, L., Li, S., 2023. Route optimization of hazardous freight transportation in a
rail-truck transportation network considering road traffic restriction. J. Clean. Prod. 423, 138640.
[42]. SteadieSeifi, M., Dellaert, N.P., Nuijten, W., Van Woensel, T., Raoufi, R., 2014. Multimodal
freight transportation planning: a literature review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 233 (1), 1–15.
[43]. Subramanyam, A., Repoussis, P.P., Gounaris, C.E., 2020. Robust optimization of a broad
class of heterogeneous vehicle routing problems under demand uncertainty. INFORMS J. Comput.
32 (3), 661–681.
[44]. Van Hassel, E., Vanelslander, T., Neyens, K., Vandeborre, H., Kindt, D., Kellens, S., 2022.
Reconsidering nearshoring to avoid global crisis impacts: application and calculation of the total
cost of ownership for specific scenarios. Res. Transp. Econ. 93, 101089.
[45]. Van Parys, B. P.G., Esfahani, P.M., Kuhn, D., 2021. From data to decisions: distributionally
robust optimization is optimal. Manage. Sci. 67 (6), 3387–3402.
[46]. Vincent, F.Y., Anh, P.T., Baldacci, R., 2023. A robust optimization approach for the vehicle
routing problem with cross-docking under demand uncertainty. Transp. Res. Part E: Logist.
Transp. Rev. 173, 103106.
[47]. Wang, T., Li, S., Zhen, L., Zhao, T., 2025. The reliable ship fleet planning problem for liner
shipping services. Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 193, 103856.
[48]. Wu, B., Zuo, X., Zhou, M., Wan, X., Zhao, X., Yang, S., 2024. A multi-objective ant colony
system-based approach to transit route network adjustment. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 25
(7), 7878–7892.
[49]. Yin, K., Wu, J., Wang, W., Lee, D.-H., Wei, Y., 2023. An integrated resilience assessment
model of urban transportation network: a case study of 40 cities in china. Transp. Res. Part A
Policy Pract. 173, 103687.
[50]. Zhang, Q., Wang, Z., Huang, M., Wang, H., Wang, X., Fang, S.-C., 2024. Collaborative supply
chain network design under demand uncertainty: a robust optimization approach. Int. J. Prod.
Econ. , 109465.
[51]. Zhang, Y., Guo, W., Negenborn, R.R., Atasoy, B., 2022a. Synchromodal transport planning
with flexible services: mathematical model and heuristic algorithm. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg.
Technol. 140, 103711.
[52]. Zhang, Y., Li, X., van Hassel, E., Negenborn, R.R., Atasoy, B., 2022b. Synchromodal transport
planning considering heterogeneous and vague preferences of shippers. Transp. Res. Part E
Logist. Transp. Rev. 164, 102827.
[53]. Pang, Y., Pan, S., Zhou, W., & Ballot, E. (2024). Resilience of Global Supply Chains with
Logistics Service Uncertainty: Onshoring Versus Offshoring Strategy. SSRN.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
