Privacy-Preserving Distributed Machine Learning And Federated Ai Systems For Healthcare And Financial Applications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29284/pa1apf13Keywords:
Federated Learning, Privacy-Preserving AI, Secure Aggregation, Differential Privacy, Healthcare and Financial Analytics.Abstract
Healthcare and financial sectors increasingly rely on data-driven machine learning while facing stringent privacy, security, and regulatory constraints. Centralized learning approaches amplify data exposure risks, making them unsuitable for sensitive domains such as electronic health records and financial transactions. This study investigates privacy-preserving distributed machine learning and federated AI systems that enable collaborative model training without sharing raw data. Using experimental evaluations on healthcare-style datasets (40,000–70,000 patient records) and large-scale financial transaction data with extreme class imbalance (<2% fraud), the results show that federated learning achieves performance close to centralized models, with only 1–3% AUROC reduction. The integration of secure aggregation and differential privacy (ε ≈ 3–5) reduces membership inference and reconstruction risks by 60–85% while maintaining acceptable predictive accuracy. Robust aggregation further improves resilience under adversarial conditions, sustaining AUROC values above 0.80 even with 20% malicious participants. Overall, the findings demonstrate that privacy, robustness, and analytical utility can be jointly optimized, making federated AI a viable solution for trustworthy healthcare and financial analytics.
References
1. Blanchard, P., El Mhamdi, E. M., Guerraoui, R., & Stainer, J. (2017). Machine learning with adversaries: Byzantine tolerant gradient descent. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 119–129.
2. Bonawitz, K., Ivanov, V., Kreuter, B., Marcedone, A., McMahan, H. B., Patel, S., Ramage, D., Segal, A., & Seth, K. (2016). Practical secure aggregation for federated learning on user-held data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.04482.
3. Choi, G. (2024). Survey of medical applications of federated learning. Healthcare Informatics Research.
4. Federal Trade Commission. (2025, March 10). New FTC data show a big jump in reported losses to fraud to $12.5 billion in 2024 (Press release).
5. IBM. (2024). Cost of a data breach report 2024. IBM Security.
6. IBM. (2025). Cost of a data breach: The healthcare industry.
7. McMahan, H. B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., & y Arcas, B. A. (2017). Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 1273–1282.
8. Nasdaq. (2024). Verafin global financial crime report. Nasdaq Verafin.
9. Onireti, M. Y., et al. (2025). Differential privacy for secure healthcare federated learning. Scientific Reports, 15, 27472.
10. Rieke, N., Hancox, J., Li, W., Milletari, F., Roth, H. R., Albarqouni, S., Bakas, S., Galtier, M. N., Landman, B. A., Maier-Hein, K., Ourselin, S., Sheller, M., Summers, R. M., Trask, A., Xu, D., Baust, M., & Cardoso, M. J. (2020). The future of digital health with federated learning. npj Digital Medicine, 3(1), 119.
11. Upreti, D. (2024). A comprehensive survey on federated learning in healthcare. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine.
12. Zhu, L., Liu, Z., & Han, S. (2019). Deep leakage from gradients. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32, 14774–14784.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

